CASES

Sweden: blockades scrap ISU deals

In March 2023, Sweden’s Service and Communications Union blockaded a bulk carrier that tried to dock in Uddevalla with an ISU-Lanibra agreement.
After first threatening court action against the union, within two days the ship’s owners backed down and signed an ITF agreement to continue their operations.
SEKO President Gabriella Lavecchia said of ISU’s representatives: “It’s all about exploiting already vulnerable people and deceiving authorities and the serious trade union movement to make as much money as possible.”
REPORT
SWEDEN
Ships turned away until companies capitulate, case 1: Bonette (IMO 9605061)
March 2023
In March 2023, Swedish ITF affiliate the Service and Communications Union (SEKO) took industrial action by blockading the bulk carrier Bonette after it sought to dock in Uddevalla on 12 March with an ISU-Lanibra agreement.
After initially threatening court action, by 14 March 2023, the ship’s owners capitulated and signed an ITF agreement and continue operations without further delay.
SEKO President Gabriella Lavecchia, condemned ISU, stating:
“It is obvious that ISU representatives are using their background and CV as a former employee of the international trade union movement to exploit workers in the international maritime industry. It’s all about exploiting already vulnerable people and deceiving authorities and the serious trade union movement to make as much money as possible.”
Ships turned away until companies capitulate, case 2: Haato (IMO 9589786)
December 2024
In December 2024, the Haato sought to dock in Halmstad under an ISU-Lanibra agreement. When the port was informed that the ship did not have a valid ITF agreement it did not allow the ship to dock.
The ship’s owner initially sought to sue the Swedish Transport Workers Union for taking illegal industrial action, seeking an interim verdict to be given in two days – this was denied by the court.
Within two weeks, and facing mounting costs, the ship’s owner reached out to, signed an agreement with the ITF, and withdrew its lawsuit – ultimately bearing court costs and potentially facing claims from the charterer over the delay incurred.